Aebly & Associates Facebook Page   Aebly & Associates Linkedin Page   Aebly & Associates Twitter Page Aebly & Associates YouTube Page
News

News

Legalized Marijuana and Employment: Off-duty Use and Drug Testing

Monday, December 20, 2021

Legalized Marijuana and Employment: Off-duty Use and Drug Testing

While all marijuana use remains illegal under federal law, most states have enacted laws that allow certain uses of marijuana or a marijuana derivative. None of these laws place any restrictions on an employer’s right to administer drug tests or to prohibit their employees from using or being under the influence of marijuana at work or during work hours.

However, it is not always clear whether an employer may take adverse employment actions against an employee based solely on a positive test for marijuana. As a result, several courts have issued decisions on this issue. These decisions will answer this question for employers in some legalized marijuana states and may be helpful for employers in others.

This Compliance Overview provides a general summary of federal and state marijuana laws.

STATE MARIJUANA LAWS DO NOT AFFECT EMPLOYERS’ RIGHTS TO:

  • Prohibit employees from using marijuana at work or during work hours

  • Prohibit employees from being under the influence of marijuana at work or during work hours
  • Require employees or applicants to undergo drug testing

STATE MARIJUANA AND OTHER LAWS MAY:

  • Require employers to make reasonable accommodations for an employees’ off-duty marijuana use
  • Prohibit employers from discriminating against employees based on off-duty marijuana use
  • Impose employer requirements for workplace drug testing policies

 

OVERVIEW

Under virtually every state law that legalizes marijuana use, employers have an explicit right to prohibit their employees from using or being under the influence of marijuana at work or during work hours. In addition, most of these laws do not place any restrictions on an employer’s right to administer drug tests.

However, the New York City (NYC) Council has enacted a local law that prohibits employers in NYC from testing job applicants (other than applicants for certain safety-sensitive positions) for marijuana as a condition of employment. This local law went into effect on May 10, 2020. Similarly, a District of Columbia law, which has been in effect since July 22, 2015, prohibits employers from testing job applicants for marijuana before making a conditional offer of employment, unless otherwise required by law. In addition, Nevada has enacted changes to its Lawful Product Use Law that prohibit employers from failing or refusing to hire a job applicant solely because he or she tests positive for marijuana. This prohibition, which is subject to certain safety-based exceptions, became effective on Jan. 1, 2020. Montana has also enacted similar changes, which go into effect on Jan. 1, 2022.

Nevertheless, employment disputes can arise when a state’s marijuana law does not address whether employers may prohibit employees or applicants from engaging in off-duty marijuana use. The inconsistency between federal law and state marijuana laws also leads to questions regarding employers’ obligations.

FEDERAL AND STATE MARIJUANA LAWS

The federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) classifies marijuana as a Schedule I substance, which means it is considered to have high potential for abuse and no currently accepted medical applications. All uses of Schedule I substances are illegal under the CSA. In addition, the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) prohibits the use, dispensing and licensing of substances, such as marijuana, that have not been approved by the federal Food and Drug Administration.

  • CBD-only – This category includes states that allow only tightly limited uses of a substance called cannabidiol (CBD), which is a derivative of marijuana that does not produce psychoactive effects in users and is usually administered in oil form. These states have not legalized the use of marijuana plants for any purpose and generally allow CBD use only for the treatment of one or more specified medical conditions, such as epilepsy in children. Because of these factors, employment-related issues rarely arise under these laws. The table below lists the states that fall into this category.

Alabama

Georgia

Iowa

Indiana

Kentucky

Louisiana

North Carolina

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Wisconsin

Wyoming

 

  • Medical-only – This category includes states that allow the use of marijuana plants for medical purposes but do not allow any recreational use. Out of the three types of state marijuana laws, medical marijuana laws generally underlie most employment-related disputes involving the drug. The table below lists the states that fall into the medical-only category.

Arizona

Delaware

Maryland

Montana

New Mexico

Ohio

Utah

Arkansas

Florida

Minnesota

Mississippi

Oklahoma

Pennsylvania

West Virginia

Connecticut

Hawaii

Missouri

New Hampshire

North Dakota

Rhode Island

 

 

  • Recreational and medical – This category includes states that allow individuals who are age 21 or older to use marijuana plants for recreational purposes. Each of these states also has a separate law governing the use of marijuana for medical purposes. The table below lists the states that fall into this category.

Alaska

Colorado

Maine

Montana

New York

South Dakota*

Arizona

District of Columbia

Massachusetts

New Jersey

Nevada

Vermont

California

Illinois

Michigan

New Mexico

Oregon

Virginia

 

 

 

 

 

Washington

*On Nov. 24, 2021, South Dakota’s Supreme Court struck down the state’s legalization law.

 

Links and Resources

 

This Compliance Overview is not intended to be exhaustive nor should any discussion or opinions be construed as legal advice. Readers should contact legal counsel for legal advice. © 2018-2021 Zywave, Inc. All rights reserved.

Print

Number of views (927)/Comments (0)